Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boutxy

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Boutxy}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Boutxy}})

I tried to PROD this, but it was removed, so I figure this is the next best place. I see no notability, though some sources do exist. The bear is just another poaching victim, which is unfortunate, but should really be included in a different article, perhaps one about the decline of brown bears in the Pyrenees. The references that are used all redirect to the article for some reason, as well. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
• Comment: {{reply to|Kingsmasher678}} This article is translated from the French Wikipedia where the references are working: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boutxy {{reply to|Insillaciv}} have you checked out Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia yet? It's allowed and encouraged to translate from the other language Wikipedias. The Creative Commons license requires attribution; it's often done with an edit summary when starting a translation. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 04:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
• :The references are really more of a nitpick than anything, my issue comes from the notability side of things. I would argue that the sources I can access, which is only the news articles for some reason, even in the french article, simply don't show a reason for this article.
• :Kingsmasher678 (talk) 15:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
• :: If the French sources don't show notability, then delete. Rjjiii (ii) (talk) 15:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
• Draftify - much as I dislike the draft system, this is potentially a valid article IMO if the references can be fixed (the reports for example are available elsewhere on the internet even though the fr-Wiki links do indeed seem to be broken), which I'm willing to attempt but don't have time to do at this exact moment. I don't agree in any case that there is no notability here, largely because the number of these bears is tiny (about 14-15 of them), and each one is named, known and followed, so individual bears often have an unusually high profile. Anyway, please draftify and I'll see if I can work it up - nothing lost if I can't. Ingratis (talk) 09:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC) In co-operation with the creator Insillaciv, obvs, if he/she/they is still around - not intending to cut them out.Ingratis (talk) 10:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: Is this a hoax? The sources don't link to anything. I don't see mentions of a bear with this name online. Why does a bear get an article, I'm not even sure what the notability is supposed to be. Oaktree b (talk) 00:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
• Comment: So this was a bear that was eating sheep [https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2006/04/21/boutxy-9-ans-200-kg-mangeur-de-brebis_763948_3244.html], [https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2007/11/08/183359-miglos-ours-l-au-revoir-de-boutxy.html], but I'm not really seeing notability... Oaktree b (talk) 00:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.