Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Bogart

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Brad Bogart}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Brad Bogart}})

Unsourced BLP. Article on a lesser known TV producer. This is clearly an autobiography since creator shares the same name as the article's subject. A WP:BEFORE search doesn't show much, and I can't find any reliable sources that mention the subject in question. Creator has added unsourced information related to the subject on several articles, and there's no way to verify if this information is true or not. Fails WP:NPRODUCER. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Television, Photography, Management, California, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. No sources in the article, and I couldn't find any either. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:58, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete and prevent recreation without admin consent. First off, it's substantially an autobiography, which is reason enough to delete. Now, the reason why this is a problem is that registered editors have a fiduciary duty to the Wikimedia Foundation not to engage in self-dealing. This violates the "punctilio of honor" principle as enunciated in Meinhard v. Salmon. It's doubly worse because we are 501(c)(3) charity, under extreme scrutiny from those in high places who want to destroy us, and will use any excuse to make free thought a crime. In 2025, everyone knows that Wikipedia is not Facebook or LinkedIn. The subject is a nepo baby, following in a parent's footsteps; he must have enough funds and education to afford his own website or other advertising. I'm not sure if the subject is "playing dumb" or intentionally trying to trap us in the web of the current rising authoritarian situation. Sorry not sorry. Bearian (talk) 08:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't meet WP:BIO. At first I thought the author of the article didn't do a good job of looking for sources, but after searching myself I didn't find anything better. Pollia (talk) 09:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete After thorough evaluation I came to know that most of the links are just trivial mentions. Cruzdoze (talk) 10:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as lack of reliable sources --Loewstisch (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.