Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Stephenson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 21:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

=[[Brad Stephenson]]=

:{{la|Brad Stephenson}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brad_Stephenson Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Brad Stephenson}})

CEO and founder of a web company. Article is more about the company than Stephenson. Refs either source the company or are reliable (linkedIn, Who's Who, Google +). Able to find alot of social media sites about him, but no reliable refs. His name is common. Bgwhite (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Delete at best as this is another classic example of a seemingly amply sourced article when there are actually no solid signs of the applicable notability. I also suggest Redirecting to Datebook after deleting as this may still be applicable. SwisterTwister talk 08:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Delete - no indication of notability. No objection to redirecting per Gene93k either. Rlendog (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete. No evidence of notability.. page seems to be self promotion. Also, the Datebook page itself has been redirected so redirecting this page is rather pointless. Spanneraol (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment I hate the non-sense namedropping people do to try an establish notability. Who cares that he stayed with "Scott Kazmir, Evan Longoria, Justin Upton, BJ Upton, and David Price after the World Series (a group who has made close to a billion dollars combined)." It's not even relevant and I think a thorough cleanup of the page is necessary should it be kept. However, it appears he wrote [http://www.amazon.com/Player-Season-Pickup-Artist-Hacked/dp/0615873391 this book] and his exploits earned him some notoriety in 2012. There's [http://www.zdnet.com/article/nike-hacker-steals-over-80000/ this] and [http://www.13newsnow.com/story/features/2016/02/11/love-week-online-dating/80223014/ this]. Alex (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Please address the last comment by Alex--Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

::The book is not notable and the sources listed by Alex dont seem to rise to the level of coverage needed for an article. Spanneraol (talk) 23:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.