Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Thornton

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 23:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

=[[Brad Thornton]]=

:{{la|Brad Thornton}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brad_Thornton Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Brad Thornton}})

BLP whose only current references from subject's own web page and IMDb. Interesting career track, and there's enough film work here to dissuade me from tagging it for an WP:A7 speedy, but I didn't find enough for him to pass notability standards for any of the particular aspects of his career (WP:NACTOR, WP:DIRECTOR, WP:MANOTE, or as an attorney), or in general per WP:GNG. Casting the delsort net far and wide, though, in case I'm wrong --Finngall ^talk 17:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 17:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 17:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 17:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 17:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 17:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete There is no significant coverage to show he meets WP:GNG. No supporting evidence is given by any reliable sources that he's notable as an actor, attorney, or martial artist. Papaursa (talk) 19:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 17:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete If only some of those claims could be supported through RS I might have some pause but I have to agree with the above.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete You tube videos and autobiographical writings do not show notability. Doesn't meet any SNG and lacks the signficiant independent coverage to meet GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete. Essentially unsourced BLP. Bishonen | talk 19:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.