Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Troemel

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 19:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

=[[Brad Troemel]]=

:{{la|Brad Troemel}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brad_Troemel Stats])

:({{Find sources|Brad Troemel}})

Completing nomination for an anonymous editor. Their rationale, posted on the article's talk page, is below. The IP editor nominating the article also removed a lot of its bulk, including many references (some clearly flawed, others less so) - the version before their edits is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brad_Troemel&oldid=522123427 here]. On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

References are both Rhizome articles by same author. Multiple secondary sources from separate established publications are required to establish notability as noted in the notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.68.70.52 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 12 December 2012‎ (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep - I've never said that before. Multiple sources found on google: Oyster Magazine: [http://oystermag.com/oyster-interview-internet-artist-brad-troemel], Huffington Post:[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/26/artist-brad-troemel-on-etsy_n_1703285.html], Artfagcity: [http://www.artfagcity.com/2012/10/24/philip-morris-orders-artist-brad-troemel-to-cease-and-desist/], Paper Mag: [http://www.papermag.com/2012/07/brad_troemel.php]. I'm suspect of the IP editor's motivations in this case. Deleted a lot of innocuous content for a clearly notable subject.--Nixie9 (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Note - I have reverted all of the recent edits by the IP user as vandalism. Additional such edits will result in semi protection (no IP editors)--Nixie9 (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers,] Riley 00:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep Those IP's edits are certainly strange, and some of the references in the bio seem to be suspect, and maybe I'm not exactly an expert on the topic, but some Google massaging seems to indicate a lot of non-routine, non-trivial coverage of this person. Perhaps it needs the attention of an expert (other than the subject himself) to be better sourced. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.