Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandie Knight
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Brandie Knight]]=
:{{la|1=Brandie Knight}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Brandie Knight}})
A surprisingly long-lived vanity article for a writer (and television executive?) whose main claim to fame seems to be obscure self-published works (see for instance [https://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Under-Covers-Brandie-Knight/dp/0615325866/ Hollywood under the Covers], published by "[https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_nm/4039137 Vegas Revolutions, LLC]", a defunct company headed by none other than... Brandie Knight, or, amusingly, Self-Publish Like a Pro), and a tangential link to Tommy Chong.
All the existing references belong to blogs and recondite trade publications or fall under WP:PRSOURCE, and the claims of working on various Hollywood projects are totally unsourced. She has received no independent coverage and fails WP:AUTHOR by every possible metric. MasqueDesRonces (talk) 11:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete spam ant not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I should add that the article's creator, VegasRev, is responsible for the [https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=VegasRev&page=Brandie%20Knight&server=enwiki&max= overwhelming majority of the article's content] and has exclusively made edits related to Brandie Knight, including several unsourced quotes from Ms. Knight, so WP:COI can reasonably be assumed. --MasqueDesRonces (talk) 13:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Oklahoma. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Potential COI aside, the subject is not notable and the article makes no support for inclusion in Wikipedia. IrishOsita (talk) 03:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.