Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazil's First Olympic Medal in Tennis

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Brazil's First Olympic Medal in Tennis}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Brazil's First Olympic Medal in Tennis}})

Unnecessary article that doesn't expand on information already covered in other articles. ProtobowlAddict ^uwu! (talk | contributions) 20:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sports, Olympics, Tennis, and Brazil. ProtobowlAddict ^uwu! (talk | contributions) 20:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

:I beleave my recent changes to the page add new information that are not on other pages and also improve the article, becouse of that I am against to the deletion of the article Haddad Maia fan (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Unnecessary content fork. All of the information can be included in Tennis at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Women's doubles or either of the two players’ articles. I oppose a redirect to any of these because Brazil's First Olympic Medal in Tennis is a very unlikely search term. Frank Anchor 22:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete – Fails as WP:SPINOFF, the event itself is already notable and information about the tennis players' performance should be in Brazil at the 2020 Summer Olympics#Summary. And note that the article appears to have been created by a WP:SPA. Svartner (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
• :The creator is hardly a SPA - they seem to edit a wide range of tennis articles, not a "very narrow area". PamD 08:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
• Comment. The topic is patently non-notable. However, sourced information should be merged into the two biographies. For instance, the section Laura Pigossi#2020–2021: Olympics debut and historic bronze medal is thin. Geschichte (talk) 08:12, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as unnecessary, but include some content about this milestone, sourced, in Sport in Brazil#Tennis. PamD 08:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. As others have mentioned, the content can be integrated in other articles. A redirect would not make sense. Paprikaiser (talk) 21:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.