Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazilian gay articles

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Recognition of same-sex unions in Brazil.---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 06:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

=[[Pension to member of same-sex couples in Brazil]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pension to member of same-sex couples in Brazil}}

:{{la|Pension to member of same-sex couples in Brazil}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazilian gay articles}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Pension to member of same-sex couples in Brazil}})

:{{la|Health benefits for same-sex couples in Brazil }}

Delete - per WP:Content forking these articles are unnecessary spin-offs from the main article Recognition of same-sex unions in Brazil. That article is not long enough nor is the information about the pension or health plan decisions detailed enough to warrant separate articles. The information is covered in the lead article. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 19:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge to Recognition of same-sex unions in Brazil per Are You The Cow Of Pain?. Lechatjaune (talk) 19:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Delete seems an unnecessary spin-off, I can't think of a similar article for any other country. I'm sure the worthwhile content can find a home somewhere else. - Schrandit (talk) 11:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge, if it's a spin-off then spin it back deletion is not the answer here. 71.139.29.193 (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

:* To be clear, the articles were not cut and pasted from the main article. They were written from scratch. The information is covered in the main articles from the original sources. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 19:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

::*The outcome is the same, merge all into the main that should be there. 71.139.29.193 (talk) 03:32, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

:::* It's already there, as I said in the nomination. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 13:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

:Merge as per Lechatjaune. Would form a suitable section for that article. Gwinva (talk) 06:46, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.