Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakout Degree

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Breakout Degree]]=

:{{la|Breakout Degree}} ([{{fullurl:Breakout Degree|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakout Degree}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested speedy. Subject lacks WP:RS, probable failure of WP:BAND. Movingboxes (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete, no verifiable evidence that this meets WP:NMG. I declined the speedy because the article asserted notability in the form of playing with blue-linked bands and having three album releases. Stifle (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete No evidence they are notable. Yet. Article can be recreated if they make it to notability. --Dweller (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete not notable. Take it to MySpace. Grsz ^talk 15:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete - non-notable; no verifiability to claims of connections. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.