Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brexitovka

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Brexitovka}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brexitovka Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Brexitovka}})

WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. This is an article about a Brexit vodka. It fails WP:SUSTAINED (and thus WP:GNG), as almost all coverage is from March/April 2017. The coverage since then are brief mentions, usually in a list of odd Brexit stuff. As a result, the page is little more than an advertisement for a company's gimmicky vodka. Reminds me of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brexit (cat). – Levivich 14:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. – Levivich 14:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. – Levivich 14:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. – Levivich 14:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. – Levivich 14:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. – Levivich 14:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

• Merge to Brexit in popular culture as a valid alternative to deletion. Does not warrant an article with its 15 minutes of fame. But maybe a sentence or two, given that it's got sources with coverage, could be mentioned in the article about the cultural impact of Brexit? Red Phoenix ^talk 15:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
• Red Phoenix brings up a good point that I should have put in my nom statement. The closer should please consider my nom a !vote for delete or merge, with or without redirect. – Levivich 16:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.