Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian A. Bottge

=[[Brian A. Bottge]]=

:{{la|Brian A. Bottge}} ([{{fullurl:Brian A. Bottge|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian A. Bottge}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable —G716 <T·C> 21:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. All academics are notable in their own way, but not (necessarily) the kind of notability Wikipedia requires. - Vianello (talk) 21:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete does not meet notability guidelines.--Serviam (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. David Eppstein (talk) 04:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Does not appear to pass WP:PROF based on the information available. GoogleScholar[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Brian%20A.%20Bottge%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws] gives only 4 papers with citation hits in double digits, with the top one at 32. I looked up his CV and there is not much there to indicate notability. It might be that he designed some educational software or some multimedia technology that is widely used around the U.S. (which would satisfy WP:PROF) but I did not see evidence of that. Nsk92 (talk) 09:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • delete per Nsk92. Note also that the entire article is a verbatim copy of [http://www.education.wisc.edu/rpse/faculty/bottge/index.htm this page] I see no copyright notice, so it's not necessarily a copy vio, but... Pete.Hurd (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, tagged as G12 (copyvio). --Dhartung | Talk 23:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.