Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Marick

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Brian Marick]]=

:{{la|Brian Marick}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brian_Marick Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Brian Marick}})

no sources given to show independent WP:BIO notability (though does show bibliography with mainstream publishers); just one of the (17?) authors of "The Manifesto for Agile Software Development" Closeapple (talk) 02:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete non-notable software developer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete It appears that Brian's notability is due to the number of books/publications written but if so, the article still fails WP:AUTHOR. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
I have added several web and book references to help establish that the subject of the article has made a significant contribution to his field of work. Faught (talk) 03:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete - he is accomplished, but I don't if I'd say he had made a significant contribution. Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: For additional comments on added sources. Sam Walton (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 13:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Delete I can see no sources that are secondary and relaible that are actually about him. Therefore, I will reccomend a delete, as per WP:GNG. The lack of secondary sources is further evidence to delete, as per WP:BASIC - Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. TheMagikCow (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.