Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridges Are Born

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 09:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

=[[Bridges Are Born]]=

:{{la|Bridges Are Born}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bridges_Are_Born Stats])

:({{Find sources|Bridges Are Born}})

Originally an expired PROD, which I turned into a redirect rather than deleting, before being reverted by the article creator. This topic has not been covered in any detail by independent, reliable sources. I would be happy to see it deleted but if not then it should be, at most, turned into a redirect. Giant Snowman 11:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

:({{Find sources|Bridges Are Born}})

Please be more specific when you say reliable sources. What info do you think it will be reliable and compliant for you to acknowledge the article? Please state them and I shall provide them.

User:andyar85 User talk:andyar85

Delete for lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. Andyar85, for information on what that means, do check out WP:RS. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I will recreate the page with more complete info. I wrote to Biruitorul. I never wrote false info since I am the manager of the band, thus making me the right person to add correct info on this. YES there weren't lots of info, but deletion based on what ?!! I had seen lots of other articles in this manner. Further info I can add to the article, but it was already connected to the band's page so you can't state there weren't related articles and info on this.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyar85 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

:*If you are the manager of the band then you should NOT be creating/editing articles related to them, see WP:COI and WP:NPOV. Based on what you've just admitted I may have to review your other contributions/creation related to this band. Giant Snowman 16:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Go ahead Giant. I know what WP:NPOV and what Wikipedia stands for and that is only as an informative platform. This is what I did. Thank you all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyar85 (talk • contribs) 07:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Keep if improved with reliable sources and notability can be established. I would given the man a break and the chance to improve the article, if possible. I think we can assume good faith here. --Codrin.B (talk) 13:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.