Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigada e Kuqe

=[[Brigada e Kuqe]]=

:{{la|Brigada e Kuqe}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brigada_e_Kuqe Stats])

:({{Find sources|Brigada e Kuqe}})

No indication this topic meets notability guidelines. Cannot imagine this in an encyclopaedia. C679 07:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep, supporter group of a major football team should be fine for notability. A quick google search gives several positive indications. Seems to have changed name to Ultras Guerrils recently, so a move might be in order. For non-BLP articles lack of good sources is not itself cause for deletion. --Soman (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

:But no indication with your keep !vote that the topic is notable, just that it "should be fine for notability". I believe it isn't. C679 11:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 11:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Redirect - I agree with Snowman, it seems a reasonable search term, but the article does not assert independent notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.