Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brilliant Basics

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Brilliant Basics]]=

:{{la|Brilliant Basics}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brilliant_Basics Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Brilliant Basics}})

Non notable 3-year-old small company. Sources are rehashed press releases, minor mentions. Not necessarily a reason to delete, the creator User:Mistersun is suspected of being an undisclosed paid editor sock. GreenC 16:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete for now as there simply appears to be no better solid coverage. SwisterTwister talk 21:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:38, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete - searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.