Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Non-Regional Pronunciation

{{ns:0|s}}

:{{la|British Non-Regional Pronunciation}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|British Non-Regional Pronunciation}})

The term "British Non-Regional Pronunciation" appears to have been used by one source briefly. It does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as it is not a widespread term in linguistics. Epa101 (talk) 09:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

I disagree about how widespread the term is - I hear it commonly enough that people will want to look it up, and we don't help them if we boycott it. But I do agree that it shouldn't be an article. Can we make this a redirect to Received Pronunciation or similar, and accommodate this one sentence with its source there, perhaps at the bottom of the historical variation section? --Doric Loon (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

:That would be perfectly acceptable to me. Epa101 (talk) 18:15, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete as a neologism that didn't catch on. Mandsford (talk) 14:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect per Doric Loon. It looks like the source does support the term, and redirects are cheap. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 12:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete/Merge/Redirect. Do something: don't care what, but get rid of the sad stub that is currently here. Grover cleveland (talk) 05:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
• Merge to Received Pronunciation. Abductive (reasoning) 22:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.