Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brix (abstract strategy game)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Brix (abstract strategy game)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brix (abstract strategy game)}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Brix (abstract strategy game)}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. qedk (t 桜 c) 07:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Brix (abstract strategy game)]]=
:{{la|Brix (abstract strategy game)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Brix (abstract strategy game)}})
No evidence of any notability even though tagged for notability and lack of sources since 2017. Created by a blocked and persistent sock puppeteer. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Velella Velella Talk 09:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: does not meet WP:NGAME. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.