Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Ashley

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The merits of redirecting a BLP to an article about sexually transmitted diseases should be discussed separately and in more depth, I think. Sandstein 07:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

=[[Brooke Ashley]]=

:{{la|Brooke Ashley}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brooke_Ashley Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Brooke Ashley}})

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FSarah_Vandella&type=revision&diff=712095873&oldid=712070202] BLP1E too Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG.. –Davey2010^Talk 03:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

:*Redirect per below - She's already mentioned there so may aswell redirect too. –Davey2010^Talk 02:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Redirect or very selectively merge to STDs in the porn industry#HIV cases, where the central incident is already discussed in a broader context. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete non-notable pornographic film actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete at best or only redirect later if needed as the article is basically still questionably better overall, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Redirect as suggested by Wolfowitz. There is already information and even a picture of her at the target article. --MelanieN (talk) 02:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.