Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Browse Happy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Browse Happy]]=

:{{la|Browse Happy}} ([{{fullurl:Browse Happy|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Browse Happy}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Does not meet notability and has no reliable sources. 16x9 (talk) 22:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Delete. The only sources cited are either primary, or from organisations who promote the subject (e.g. Automattic). Cynical (talk) 22:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep - First, why isn't this article tagged with an AFD notification? Second, try a Google News search for sources. Personally, I found sources in three different languages. To me, that denotes notability. Thanks - ShoesssS ^Talk 03:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment. There's an edit war on this page, which might be the reason for its appearance here without a proper AfD nomination. I'm neutral about deletion. --Lockley (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

::Comment - Did not know anything about the edit war (which looks to be over 6 months ago) and I do not know what is wrong with the AfD nomination... I will try to fix. 16x9 (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

:::Comment. Understood, thanks for pursuing! --Lockley (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep as meeting WP:WEB. After keeping this, a merger with Web Standards Project (former owner) and/or Automattic (current owner) might be discussed. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 17:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep with added sources. Themfromspace (talk) 09:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.