Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Mau Design (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bruce Mau. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Bruce Mau Design]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Mau Design}}

:{{la|Bruce Mau Design}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bruce_Mau_Design_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Bruce Mau Design}})

No real demonstration of notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. Perhaps redirect to Bruce Mau. Edwardx (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Bruce Mau Design and Bruce Mau are two seperate entities.Jihef84 (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Redirect or merge to Bruce Mau per nom. --Pontificalibus (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Bruce Mau no longer affiliated with Bruce Mau Design. Merging to Bruce Mau creates false impression. Ebircs (talk) 14:58, 17 August 2017 (EST)

::I would suggest that the fact the firm was created and headed initially by Bruce Mau is the only reason why it might be notable. A mention in the Bruce Mau article seems appropriate in the absence of in-depth coverage about it. If Bruce Mau has no current links to the firm, this can also be stated. --Pontificalibus (talk) 11:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 03:25, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to Bruce Mau; not independently notable. A directory listing / wp:promo article. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.