Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Felix

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Bruno Felix}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Felix}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Bruno Felix}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Bruno Felix]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Bruno Felix}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Bruno Felix}})

In CAT:NN for 14 years. Some coverage, but not enough coverage or significance to meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

:Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete. I see zero secondary sources. There's a plain WP:SIGCOV failure. Bearian (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.