Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brynhild Olivier

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. if you want new a copy of the article you can request it on my talk page and I can provide a userfied version. Nothing has being made during the weekend so I had to go with the consensus here which is for deletion JForget 20:55, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Brynhild Olivier]]=

:{{la|Brynhild Olivier}} ([{{fullurl:Brynhild Olivier|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brynhild Olivier}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Brynhild Olivier}})

Subject of article has no claim of notability except by association with others. Prod removed with claim to fix it some time later. noq (talk) 23:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Delete - No claim to notability. Association with others doesn't count as notability. Very few sources, and many (if not all of them) are irrelevant.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail 18:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I committed to finish my edits this coming weekend, not some (unspecified) time later. The subject of the article was part of the Bloomsbury Group. Aarkangel (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 23:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete, sorry, but we need coverage to be provided at the article. Nyttend (talk) 12:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Userfy The article makes no claim of notability at the moment, but the single editor claims to have plans to improve it. I don't see much hope, but rather than spend time researching whether there might be adequate sourcing somewhere, why not move it to the editors subpage. This is how it should have started anyway, as someone who is not prepared to meet the guidelines at initial creation should be creating in user space until ready.--SPhilbrick T 02:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.