Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bugbear (Dungeons & Dragons)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  12:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Bugbear (Dungeons & Dragons)]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Bugbear (Dungeons & Dragons)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bugbear_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Bugbear (Dungeons & Dragons)}})

Non-notable monster that fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, all sources in the article are WP:PRIMARY. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete - per WP:GAMEGUIDE. Wikipedia is not the monster manual. No notability outside of the game system. -- Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails WP:GNG. There is no content worth merging at this time. TTN (talk) 13:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete - The available sources are the usual array of game books, game guides, and trivial mentions that do not pass the WP:GNG. As the D&D creature bears pretty much no resemblance to the actual Bugbear outside of having lifted its name, this would not be a useful article to redirect or merge there. Rorshacma (talk) 01:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Bugbear, where a sentence or so can be added, even if based on PRIMARY or such, given that it is very underdeveloped and could use an 'in-popular culture'. Something that might plausibly be saved, even if a little bit, through merge. Ping User:Toughpigs. I started a popculture section there, I just don't know if there is anything we can salvage from this PRIMARY article, even to mention bb's appear in D&D... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.