Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbous Cell Media Group

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Bulbous Cell Media Group]]=

:{{la|Bulbous Cell Media Group}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Bulbous Cell Media Group}})

Non-notable media group lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Fails WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 04:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete — cannot find sufficient reliable sources for verification. Does not appear to meet notability requirements. Feezo (Talk) 04:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete 1 hit in gnews. LibStar (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete per nom. and failing WP:GNG, WP:CORP, WP:N, and WP:V. ArcAngel (talk) ) 07:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete I'd hoped to save this, just because I love the phrase "bulbous cell", but there's nowhere near the sourcing that would be required to establish notability under WP:GNG nor WP:CORP. (I was not able to determine (if there is one) a Japanese form of the company name, but I'm not certain that there is one aside from the Romanized form, if there is, then my attempts to search were not made in view of that.). --j⚛e decker ^{talk to me} 07:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.