Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbulators
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Bulbulators}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbulators}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Bulbulators}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 13:57, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Bulbulators]]=
:{{la|1=Bulbulators}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Bulbulators}})
I found no significant coverage and the only reference is Facebook. The Polish article only has the Facebook page as well. SL93 (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Poland. SL93 (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete. I reported it to pl wiki where I started a deletion discussion: :pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2022:06:03:Bulbulators. My own querry found two passing mentions in academic works, one English [https://books.google.pl/books?id=Q07ADwAAQBAJ&pg=PT228&dq=%22Bulbulators%22+-inpublisher:icon&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjLiMGLqZH4AhXQpIsKHSQFB3IQ6AF6BAgGEAI#v=onepage&q=%22Bulbulators%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false] and one Polish [https://books.google.pl/books?id=QMROEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA202&dq=%22Bulbulators%22+-inpublisher:icon&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjLiMGLqZH4AhXQpIsKHSQFB3IQ6AF6BAgDEAI#v=onepage&q=%22Bulbulators%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false], it's not nothing but it's not sufficient IMHO given WP:SIGCOV. Let's see if others can dig up more sources. PS. It's possible that the first book has more coverage, but I only get snippet view besides the one page (I also checked Z-library etc., no luck). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.