Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunthit Watanapa

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that it does not meet the standard for academics DGG ( talk ) 22:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

=[[Bunthit Watanapa]]=

:{{la|Bunthit Watanapa}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Bunthit Watanapa}})

Subject does not appear to pass Wikipedia's notability criteria. Paul_012 (talk) 09:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Article is a (rather poor) CV and shows nothing to suggest notability. Emeraude (talk) 13:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete I couldn't find any notability elements for PROF in article. Also, google scholar shows citations of 21, 3, 3, 1, etc. which is too low. In addition, no newspaper or magazine mention from a google search... Tradedia (talk) 14:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. No non-primary sources, no evidence of passing WP:PROF, and large chunks of the article are copied and pasted from his web site (not really a copyvio as they are factual data rather than prose with enough creativity to be copyrightable, but still problematic). —David Eppstein (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.