Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burden (EP)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Burden (EP)]]=

:{{la|Burden (EP)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Burden_(EP) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Burden (EP)}})

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NALBUM. Questionable notability, and "notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." Enwebb (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Delete. There once was a time when our notability standard for albums was "as long as the band has an article, every album they ever recorded is automatically a valid spinoff". But that's not the standard anymore — albums now require chart placements, award nominations or wins, and/or critical attention that gets them past WP:GNG, none of which have been shown here. This just states that the EP exists, and sources the fact only to a post on the record label's Facebook page, but social media posts aren't notability-supporting sources, and content self-published by directly-affiliated people or organizations aren't notability-supporting sources. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better than this. Bearcat (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:NALBUMS, what more can be said for an article with just a track listing. Mattg82 (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.