Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush–Clinton era

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Bush–Clinton era]]=

:{{la|Bush–Clinton era}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bush%E2%80%93Clinton_era Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Bush–Clinton era}})

The article is a grab-bag of topics, and almost entirely original research. It possibly could be a redirect, but I don't see any good target. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Delete Seems like a POV fork. There aren't really any sources in the article that support the notion that the "Bush-Clinton era" is a significant term or concept in journalism or political science, and googling the term didn't turn up relevant sources of significance either. There are obviously people who don't like either the Bushes or the Clintons and will see them as part of the same problem in US politics (money, dynasties), but I don't see much support for the "era" concept in reliable sources. I will note that this article was started in 2008 and briefly covered the Bush and Clinton presidencies, since then the article has been widened to also cover the Obama years, which on its face appear even more dubious, but the overall lack of sources makes it difficult to make a source-based limitation of the concept. Iselilja (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete as WP:OR. There are not reliable sources covering something known as the Bush-Clinton era. It is a purely arbitrary combination of two U.S. Presidential tenures. Cbl62 (talk) 06:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.