Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business augmentation services

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Business augmentation services]]=

:{{la|Business augmentation services}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Business_augmentation_services Stats])

:({{Find sources|Business augmentation services}})

I dont think this phrase is notable, and is apparently just a corporate phrase used to cover the field of support services for business growth. the main book is [http://books.google.com/books?id=ifxRXwAACAAJ&dq=%22business+augmentation+services%22&source=bl&ots=6WvaModOXD&sig=vfxucJoSZuU54e92Yv5_512LBT8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pQSGUNGCI4KsjAKkgIFg&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA], which is Wikipedia articles. NONE of the weblinks reference the phrase (except the 2 i added). If someone can find this phrase critiqued or mentioned outside job ads in the Economist, et al, bring it forward. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:48, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

  • I am leaning towards delete as a spammy essay. Bearian (talk) 18:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. If BAS were genuine business terminology, I would expect it to be used in a number of books on business, but gbooks has nothing except for Wikimedia-derived material. Of the references, virtuous.com is sales spam (and this is the only place the term BAS is used, leading me to suspect that the whole article is disguised spam for Virtuos), Times of India links to a directory, not an article, fn#1 is a deadlink, fn#2 is deadlink, fn#3 fails verification of the fact cited...at this point I stopped checking. SpinningSpark 17:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.