Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CITYpeek (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=CITYpeek}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=CITYpeek}})

Fails the notability guideline for companies. Passing mentions in local sources only. – Teratix ₵ 16:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Travel and tourism, Websites, and Maryland. – Teratix ₵ 16:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Delete. Neither in the cited sources nor anywhere else that I have seen is there any substantial coverage in independent sources. JBW (talk) 11:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Previously brought to AFD, not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: For an article to meet WP:BASICS, it needs to have a strong context supported with reliable sources per WP:RS or then, we aren't arguing. GNG must be met before looking at WP:NCORP, an adittional criteria for various SNGs. The product isn't notable. Pls delete! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.