Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CM Elangovan

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. czar 03:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

=[[:CM Elangovan]]=

:{{la|1=CM Elangovan}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=CM Elangovan}})

Per Wikipedia:NCREATIVE and WP:Too early, draftify till more films with articles release. DareshMohan (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep have done 3 more films and have realible links.
Comment Entire article relies entirely on one interview. Passing mentions add no notability.

class="wikitable sortable"
Rule ! Result
The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or \|{{no}}
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; or \|{{no}}
The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series); or \|{{no}}
The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. \|{{no}}

class="wikitable sortable"

Rule

! Result

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or

|{{no}}

The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; or

|{{no}}

The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series); or

|{{no}}

The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

|{{no}}

DareshMohan (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Please sign comments in deletion discussions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Delete - very, very low-key films + limited sourcing on wide coverage. Neutral Fan (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete. WP:TOOSOON. May be notable in the future, but not now. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.