Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cablenet

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

=[[Cablenet]]=

:{{la|Cablenet}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cablenet Stats])

:({{Find sources|Cablenet}})

This article is an advertisement for the company. It begins by showing off the company's strong points and proceeds to list the channels they offer. The only thing missing is price information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savinos (talkcontribs)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Relisting comment: AfD was not properly created or listed. This marks the first actual listing on a log page.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Finngall talk 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


Comment -- AfD tag was applied by an IP. The creation of this discussion page is the above editor's only edit to date, presumably the same person. Article has already undergone some cleanup since the tag was applied. I'm staying officially neutral on the deletion question. --Finngall talk 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete Article remains merely an advert, with no sourcing and, as the OP says, is lacking only a price list. StuartDouglas (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  15:31, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.