Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cai Wen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

=[[Cai Wen]]=

:{{la|Cai Wen}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cai_Wen Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Cai Wen}})

seemingly NN academic The Dissident Aggressor 20:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete - Per nom. Plus, article started by sock. NickCT (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete Lacks independent sources so it fails the GNG. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 00:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Weak delete I can find numerous published articles about Extenics, the theory he has developed. Most of them cite his work. There are also books and articles that he has published, or that he has edited. I can't find anything about him, however, nor the kind of material that would rise to notability as an academic. I think that if someone wishes to include Extenics in WP there may be enough sources to do so, and that would make more sense than having an article on Cai Wen. LaMona (talk) 23:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.