Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call of Nature (band)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7, or {{tl|db-band}} kelapstick(bainuu) 06:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

=[[Call of Nature (band)]]=

:{{la|Call of Nature (band)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Call_of_Nature_(band) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Call of Nature (band)}})

Fails WP:BAND - no secondary sources, highest award seems to have been a high school "battle of the bands", band has apparently never released an album. McGeddon (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

  • DELETE because there is no usable content in the article. Dkendr (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. So many things this could be, including WP:G11 spam, or WP:G3 hoax. And I say hoax because the 2015 "collaborated with a John Lennon Christmas song "Happy Christmas". Maybe it's someone not good with English, but they surely were not collaborators on the long-deceased Lennon's original 1971 Happy Xmas (War Is Over). They don't even have the name of the song correct. Maybe they mean "collaborate" to be the band collaborated with itself to sing on the radio. Who knows. I could even guess that it's a case of WP:PNT, liner notes or other promotional material originally in the Filipino language and poorly translated. In any event, there is no sourcing whatsoever, and nothing comes up in an internet search for this band. — Maile (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Clearly not a notable band. JDDJS (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. The subject is not notable and the article has no references and is promotinal in tone. Sixth of March 22:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as nothing at all including at least minimal notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Looks like the model of what NOT to do for a band article. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC) 7 April 2016

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.