Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calliflower

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Calliflower]]=

:{{la|Calliflower}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Calliflower}})

The company is not notable. I also just did a google search and it came up with 185,000 results with the first few of them being the company itself, the other are just sites, that don't talk about the company or provide references to make it notable. Also currently the article sounds and looks like it is a WP:G11 an unambiguous advertisement. Clarkcj12 (talk) 18:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete I can't find reliable sources establishing the company's notability, and the long feature list in the article makes it look like a WP:G11 to me as well. If someone has reliable sources establishing notability, they should edit the article accordingly. Circumspect (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep Reliable sources (Wall Street Journal, Forbes and CNet) added to establish notability for firm and founder (Alec Saunders), as well as elimination of all features except for those referencing other articles. Slbedford (talk)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:12, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.