Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CandN

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[CandN]]=

:{{la|CandN}} ([{{fullurl:CandN|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CandN}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable band. JaGa^talk 07:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party notability WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 01:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Strong delete fails WP:MUSIC as band has not had a single or album chart - none that I could find anyway. ArcAngel (talk) 06:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Hello Christian and Nate, AfD stands for Article for Deletion, and the large lack of reliable sources means your article is going to be. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.