Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candala

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect to Chandala. Everyone including nominator supports this as it's a common alternate spelling for Chandala —SpacemanSpiff 16:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

=[[Candala]]=

:{{la|Candala}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Candala}})

Reason Harsimaja (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

There's already an article 'Chandala', and this article now adds nothing new, besides being rather awful.

  • Delete unless its a common enough typo, in which case we should perhaps consider redirct to Chandala... Ohconfucius ¡digame! 14:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Redirect - it's a plausible search term and the other article has more info. Peridon (talk) 18:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Indeed, a redirection would be best - I was not aware the procedure was different. Either way, this actual article must go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harsimaja (talk • contribs) 18:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Chandala; both seem to discuss about the same topic and the Candala article is unreferenced and inferior to the Chandala article. Salih (talk) 04:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Redirect valid (though archaic) search term--Sodabottle (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Not archaic - it's the standard international Sanskrit transliteration of 'chandala', so it is reasonable to assume any non-Indians who have come across the term in a religious context might spell it like that. Even more reason it ought to be redirected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harsimaja (talk • contribs) 17:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.