Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capsule rmx

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Capsule rmx]]=

:{{la|Capsule rmx}} ([{{fullurl:Capsule rmx|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capsule rmx}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete non notable album Mayalld (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

::That is a mere statement. Please expand on your reasoning. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep Appears to be decently notable in foreign music scene. Good number of ghits that arent wikipedia or myspace. I see no reason to delete this. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep and improve. Album by notable Japanese group, capsule. the wub "?!" 16:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Based on the notable acts related to capsule, I'd say the band itself (and thus the album) is notable too. It would help if the article on the band was referenced, though. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to band article. Unreferenced. Nothing more than a tracklisting. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.