Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl-Michael Edenborg

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

=[[Carl-Michael Edenborg]]=

:{{la|Carl-Michael Edenborg}} ([{{fullurl:Carl-Michael Edenborg|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl-Michael Edenborg}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

[http://www.google.com/search?hl=la&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&hs=XpM&q=%22Carl-Michael+Edenborg%22+-wikipedia&btnG=Quaere 827] off-wiki hits are not enough to establish the fame of the subject. Alexius08 (talk) 12:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nja²⁴⁷ 08:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. --Vejvančický (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Keep Edenborg is mainly a local guy and may not meet the notability criteria for scientists. He is the founder (in 1992) and an editor of Vertigo, a small but well known Swedish publishing firm. Article should be kept but may need further polish. -- Kurtan (talk) 09:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Keep There is some room for improvement, maybe with the help of Swedish editors? --Vejvančický (talk) 16:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.