Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Gershenson

:{{la|Carlos Gershenson}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Carlos_Gershenson Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Carlos Gershenson}})

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:PROF or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 19:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

• Keep A search in Google news reveals coverage from multiple reliable sources like [http://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/tech/dos-mexicanos-que-cautivaron-a-google.html this one] in Spanish or [http://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/ciencia/2015/aplicacion-disminuir-transito-101241.html this one] from El Universal where it is reported he received an award for an app he developed. In google books there are also multiple hits, mainly as author. As an example even if it may not count as an independent source, [https://books.google.es/books?id=fbjlY3DYoAcC&pg=PA563&dq=%22Carlos+Gershenson%22&hl=es&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Carlos%20Gershenson%22&f=false this book] in which he cooperated includes a brief bio. There seems to be enough independent and in depth coverage, and since the article does not violate Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not I believe that it meets our general notability guidelines.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  20:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  20:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  20:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

• Comment as I am uncertain how to comment given the field, because the contents above are something but the article still seems questionable. Notifying {{U|DGG}} for analysis. SwisterTwister talk 01:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Six papers with over 100 citations according to Google Scholar. That's enough to show anyone an authority in their subject. Iadd the most cited to the article. the refs above should be added also. {{U|Kku}}, it is not of benefit to add articles as incomplete as this one was and let other people do the necessary work to show notability . DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

• Withdraw nomination my error. Boleyn (talk) 07:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.