Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Gustavo Rosado Muñoz

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Carlos Gustavo Rosado Muñoz}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Carlos Gustavo Rosado Muñoz}})

Doesn't seem notable, very weak sourcing with only one source. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 14:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Mexico. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Mathematics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
• Comment. I was able to verify that he received a licenciate in actuarial mathematics from UNAM in 1964 [https://ru.dgb.unam.mx/handle/20.500.14330/TES01000060001]. Searching Google Scholar did not find anything by the subject. But it did find [https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_to_imagen_fs.php?codnota=4966766&fecha=28/03/2007&cod_diario=210806], apparently a 2007 government notice to other government agencies and states informing them that they must not do business with him (or someone with the same name). I could not find anything in the article to explain this, but it seems like the sort of thing that should be reflected somehow in our article, with better sourcing. However, neither of these finds directly contributes to notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
• On reflection, if it turns out that we cannot find sourcing for what this is about, it might be a reason to delete the article: there is information that is inadequately sourced for WP:BLP to allow us to mention, but for which not mentioning is problematic with respect to WP:N, and therefore deleting is the best resolution of this contradiction. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:05, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Since he died in 2013, BLP would no longer apply. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

• Delete: Orphaned article without any source. Subject of the article is not notable. WP:NOT is not met. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itzcuauhtli11 (talk • contribs)

:

• Delete as I didn't express a clear !vote above. We don't have evidence of WP:GNG, nor sourcing usable for an article. There are claims that might plausibly pass WP:PROF#C6 but we do not have sourcing to verify them let alone judge their significance. We do have evidence that the article is not a full and accurate reflection of his life. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as per above, and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Bearian (talk) 21:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.