Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmine (color)
=[[Carmine (color)]]=
:{{la|Carmine (color)}} – (
:({{Find sources|Carmine (color)}})
Many other articles about pigments and colors are combined. Also, major discrepancies between Carmine and Carmine (color), such as the actual hue of carmine Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 21:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
:Agree that the articles could be combined, so why is this a deletion instead of a merge? Is the plan to merge the color info into Carmine after the deletion? VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
::But if the color and pigment have contradictory information, one or both must not be good analysis... Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 15:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
:::But it looks like the Carmine article has the bad analysis because it appears to display an incorrect color for the pigment. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Merge into Variations of red - Carmine is certainly an important color. However, I don't think it is notable enough for its own article. Better is to describe it in a larger article devoted to various shades of red, namely Variations of red. That is the convention used for colors in WP - for example see the other "color list" articles such as Variations of green or Variations of blue. To deserve its own article, the color carmine would need a large number of significant sources, but the article shows only two trivial sources. --Noleander (talk) 06:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.