Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Farberger

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. plicit 10:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Caroline Farberger]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Caroline Farberger}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Caroline Farberger}})

CEO of redlinked company, appears to have generated discussion as a trans-gender CEO. No other evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG; WP:NBUSINESSPERSON as a CEO. If there's inherent notability (putting aside bravery) in being a publicly trans CEO, I defer to others. My reading is, no. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

:Comment: The Swedish version of the article has more sources. In addition to being the CEO of a company, she is a published author. The attention she received in the media stems from her writing, not from her business leadership. Vexations (talk) 13:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

  • Keep i created the article due to WP:SIGCOV: profile articles written in Bloomberg and Der Spiegel{{Cite news|last=Quecke|first=Franca|date=2022-01-28|title=Coming-out als CEO: Der Weg eines Topmanagers, vom Mann zur Frau - DER SPIEGEL|language=de|work=Der Spiegel|url=https://www.spiegel.de/karriere/coming-out-als-ceo-der-weg-eines-topmanagers-vom-mann-zur-frau-a-8fc50eac-cb01-4f1f-97a9-9ef085fc67fb|access-date=2022-01-28|issn=2195-1349}}{{Cite web|title=CEO who was once man brings unique gender perspective|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-30/ceo-who-was-once-a-man-brings-unique-gender-equality-perspective|website=Bloomberg News}} (the two refs of the English article at the time of nom). GNG is agnostic about what a subject is notable for. Why should SIGCOV about being trans not still be SIGCOV? The trans part should be expanded on in the article though, otherwise very stubby. I just added a bit and updated the article. Seems like she left ICA Gruppen for some fund ‎⠀Trimton⠀‎‎ 18:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:Comment: in addition to the international media coverage she has in fact recieved plenty of coverage in swedish newspapers at several points for various reasons: coming out as trans in 2018, winning "LGBTQ-person of the year" in 2019, adding coverage for costs associated with domestic violence to the ICA homeowners insurance in 2019, before and after participating in Sommar i P1 in 2019, participating in {{Template:ILL|Vinter i P1|sv}} in 2019, publishing her book in 2020 and changing jobs in 2022. I'm seeing a sustained media interest in this person and perhaps this is a case of WP:GNG superseding any specific notability policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Draken Bowser (talkcontribs) 13:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

  • Keep. WP:HEY – the article has been significantly rewritten since it was taken to AfD. As Draken Bowser writes, there's a sustained media interest in her and the article meets WP:GNG. /Julle (talk) 21:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep. The CNBC and Economic Times sources demonstrate that GNG is passed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep satisfies GNG per the above. Draken Bowser (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep passes WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. —Natalie RicciNatalie 20:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.