Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio CTK-4200
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Casio CTK-4200}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio CTK-4200}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Casio CTK-4200}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. GirthSummit (blether) 18:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Casio CTK-4200]]=
:{{la|Casio CTK-4200}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Casio CTK-4200}})
Fails WP:NPRODUCT. No references, no claims of notability. No sigcov that indicates why this product is more special than any other electronic keyboard Rogermx (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.