Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassia Harvey

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

=[[Cassia Harvey]]=

:{{la|Cassia Harvey}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cassia_Harvey Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Cassia Harvey}})

None of the listed sources are actually convincing for her own notability and my searches have found nothing better, Worldcat only lists her at 10 libraries so there's certainly no notability as an author. SwisterTwister talk 18:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Delete Massive publishing does not make someone notable, coverage of the work in reliable sources does, and we lack that here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Comment I am not sure which way to go on this, pending further research. The article definitely needs improvement, (and may have some copyvio issues, compare to [http://www.cassiaharvey.com/about.html her web site]) But quality and notability are different things. Her works look to be pedagogy books ([https://books.google.com/books?id=DelTo2DvKiYC&pg=PP2 example]), and so their quantity makes sense. And on that note (pun intended) the "only 10 libraries" is a poor guideline, libraries generally don't carry pedagogy books, so 10 is actually impressive... I found several pages showing groups she's played in (example: [https://pages.groupmuse.com/philmore-ensemble]), I acknowledge a lot of her books are [http://www.charveypublications.com/ self-published], but they are pedagogy, not novels... and her imprint appears to be listed with the [http://www.mpa.org/music-publisher/3969 relevant trade organization]. Her web page mentions some orchestras with which she has played, not certain of their notability. This should be listed at the Musician list for people with expertise to assess. Montanabw ^(talk) 04:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

:: {{talkquote|i=y|libraries generally don't carry pedagogy books}} Libraries are some of the only places that carry pedagogical books... especially libraries at teachers colleges, which would be included in WorldCat. File:Eye close font awesome.svg czar 05:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Delete -- sources do not suggest notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.