Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassian Delsar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 07:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Cassian Delsar]]=

:{{la|Cassian Delsar}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cassian_Delsar Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Cassian Delsar}})

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep has played over 130 games in the AIHL, the highest level of competition in Australia and has been a member of the national team, representing Australia at a number of World Championships. Dan arndt (talk) 06:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: Drastically fails GNG, the player barely even has any WP:ROUTINE sources. Fails NHOCKEY by playing in an amateur league that has not been proven to meet GNG consistently and in the third tier of the IIHF tournaments. Yosemiter (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jupitus Smart 10:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete No evidence that he passes either GNG or NHOCKEY.18abruce (talk) 23:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.