Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalyst (single)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Public Relations Exercise. MBisanz ^talk 02:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Catalyst (single)]]=

:{{la|Catalyst (single)}} ([{{fullurl:Catalyst (single)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalyst (single)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable song, no sources, didn't chart. Seems unlikely redirect given the "(single)" at the end, which goes against naming conventions anyway. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 05:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 08:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: non-notable song WP:NSONGS. JamesBurns (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to artist. As WP:MUSIC#Song states: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist prominently performed the song." Delete editors are only quoting some of the WP:NSONGS/WP:MUSIC#Song policy, not all of it.travb (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.