Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Lam

:{{la|Catherine Lam}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Catherine_Lam Stats])

:({{Find sources|Catherine Lam}})

Insufficient notability indicated in the article as it stands. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

• Delete A total of four sentences about her and her company in Business Week is just a passing mention that does not amount to significant coverage. I was unable to find significant coverage elsewhere, just an assortment of directory listings. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Delete - I have to give the woman props: $20 million a year in sales is crazy good. However, there isn't enough to establish notability. Bali88 (talk) 06:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:42. The only reliable source is the Business Week article. Bearian (talk) 20:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.