Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavan Scott

:{{la|Cavan Scott}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Cavan Scott}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Cavan Scott}})

Apparently non-notable author/editor, no awards list, unreferenced blp. I can't find significant coverage via google news or books, although there is some passing mention. --Nuujinn (talk) 19:36, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. I think he's written enough notable audio plays to pass for notability. (Okay, there isn't a specific notability criteria like this for writers, but if actors can qualify for notability through significant notable appearances in works, it's common sense to do for the for the writers.) Should this not be enough, I suggest a merge to Big Finish Productions where he seems to have done most of his work. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge per Chris' suggestion. The sources don't seem to be out there - I am completely willing to reconsider my !vote if sourcing can be found and added, please let me know!--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 17:54, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
• Comment, the merge suggestion seems a good one, then if the subject rises to meet notability requirements it can be broken out as a separate article, and in the mean time we'll have a redirect in place. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Keep Well known prose and audio author, editor and interviewer (for Countryfile Magazine, Big Finish Productions, the BBC and others). StuartDouglas (talk) 22:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

• Delete for apparent lack of sources on the person. The plays and the production company do not assert that much importance beyond the Doctor Who sphere either. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:05, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.