Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centennial Aviation Club

:{{la|Centennial Aviation Club}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Centennial Aviation Club}})

• Delete. Non-notable company, fails to meet WP:CORP, search for second or third party references did not turn up anything useable. Essentially a WP:SPAM article. Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cind.amuse 04:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - In working with the members of the company who have been editing this article I have come to the same conclusion - I have been completely unable to find any independent third party refs to meet WP:CORP, it is non-notable. In the world of aviation most flying schools have been found to be non-notable and many Wikipedia articles have been deleted in recent months for this reason. This company doesn't even own any aircraft, but rents them from another school! The article is essentially WP:SPAM started by WP:COI editors to promote their company. - Ahunt (talk) 14:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Notification of the existance of this AfD has been made at both Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft
• Delete per Ahunt. Not so much WP:SPAM, but definitely fails WP:NOTADVERTISING. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû _(blah?) 14:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete as per Ahunt with no sign of notability. MilborneOne (talk) 18:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete, lack of 3rd party references means it fails the notability test. Mjroots (talk) 19:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete per nom (except the SPAM part). Plenty of time and help given to try to find rs. --Lyncs (talk) 20:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Userfy, company has some notability, however it appears that other editors feel that there is not enough notability to keep it in the general Wikipedia namespace Andrew Kurish (talk) 04:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

:*I think the club is a very neat idea and was actually surprised to not find anything in a search of Google News. I would have thought you would have gotten some local press coverage. I am sure you will and at that point you can recreate the article. Understand that Wikipedia cannot get out in front of coverage just because something exists and we think that it "should" have an article. See WP:NOR. IMO, it would be better for you just to store it on your personal computer until you can come up with some notability for it. --Lyncs (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

::*Thank you for your comments I am storing the page on my computer and hoping that it stays even if only in the user namespace. We have received some local news coverage and I will be working to add that to the article tonight (EST USA).Andrew Kurish (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.